THE WORST THING WE READ™
Israel Can't Dig Up a Reason for Attacking Al-Shifa Hospital
IN THE MIDDLE of a war, with disinformation and explosives flying, it can be nearly impossible to establish the undisputed truth. Identifying an obvious falsehood, though, can be a lot easier. In October, the Israel Defense Forces declared that there was an underground complex below Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza, and that it was "the center for Hamas terrorism in Gaza." On that basis, Israeli forces besieged and then overran the hospital in November, destroying a major medical center and causing suffering and death among civilians, including the deaths of premature babies.
Al-Shifa Hospital, it has since become clear, was not the center for Hamas terrorism in Gaza.
What to do with this information? The IDF has responded, through the intervening weeks and months, by trying to supply other, loosely related information about the hospital complex. This morning's New York Times, drawing on Israeli military and intelligence sources, revisited Al-Shifa under the headline "How a Tunnel Under a Hospital May Have Been Used by Hamas." Under four reporters' bylines, accompanied by a 3-D rendering of a simple bending tube, the Times wrote:
Al-Shifa Hospital has taken on particular significance because it is Gaza’s largest medical facility, and because of Israel’s high-profile claims that Hamas leaders operated a command-and-control center beneath it. Hamas and the hospital’s staff, meanwhile, insisted it was only a medical center.
Al-Shifa’s value as a military target was not immediately clear in the days after the Nov. 15 raid, even after the Israeli military released the tunnel video that was used to create the 3-D model seen here.
But evidence examined by The New York Times suggests Hamas used the hospital for cover, stored weapons inside it and maintained a hardened tunnel beneath the complex that was supplied with water, power and air-conditioning.
The word "But," as a transition between those last two paragraphs, conveyed that the "evidence examined by the New York Times" had helped establish the hospital's "value as a military target." It hadn't. Or if it had, that value was approximately zero.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to INDIGNITY to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.